“That gate had been previously written up as having a problem fix, and in the preceding days to this incident, had not been identified as having any additional problems,” he said. However, Said said, in response to the AFIG inquiry, the base “reemphasized to all their security forces personnel all the basic steps that are required and the protocols and the procedures at the gate.” Accessing the Flight Line and Getting on the PlaneĪfter getting on base, the intruder then entered the Andrews flight line via an automatic gate that malfunctioned and remained about a foot and a half open, Said said. I didn’t do it because I was distracted … and failed to follow through.’” It was an individual failure by an Airman that clearly then said, ‘I know what I’m supposed to do. “We didn’t find any particular indication that overall training is deficient, overall tactics, techniques, and procedures are deficient. “At the end of the day, it was a human error at the gate,” he said. The Airmen’s mistake wasn’t the result of broader training or operational issues, Said added. “We don’t want to undermine that or embarrass them, but yes, action against that particular Airman is complete.” “Command action been taken against the Airman at the gate, and as you know, we don’t disclose the specifics just out of privacy for the particular individuals,” he said. The Airman has been disciplined, but Said wouldn’t disclose what that looked like. During questioning, the Airman admitted to have gotten “complacent” and ignoring standard procedures in letting him on base, the report added. The defender who let him through said they couldn’t recall whether the intruder “presented his driver’s license or any other form of ID prior to driving through the gate,” even after watching a video replay of the incident, it stated. The intruder shouldn’t have been allowed on base since he lacked a Defense Biometric Identification System card or other alternate ID that would’ve given him access, and wasn’t on Andrews’ Entry Access List, the report stated. The first, he said, was that a 316th Security Forces Squadron Airman allowed the man to enter a base gate “without the proper credentials.” Said said that “three layers of breakdown” made the events of Feb. Getting On Baseĭuring a March 11 call with reporters, AFIG Lt. In a report released March 11, the IG said the intruder came upon a malfunctioning gate and, because of other Airmen’s mistakes, accessed the Andrews flight line and boarded a C-40B aircraft assigned to the 89th Airlift Wing. 4, the Air Force Inspector General found. A complacent defender failed to prevent an intruder from accessing Joint Base Andrews, Md., on Feb.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |